Skip to main content

Question 2.4.2

Solutions

TZ
leumasicOfficial

7 months ago

(a) We ought to first prove that a limit exists before assuming that it does. This argument assumes beforehand that the limit exists. In fact, it isn't hard to see that this sequence simply alternates between 1 and 2, causing it to diverge.

(b) It can, only if it converges. The burden now is on us to determine whether it does or doesn't.

On first inspection, the sequence seems to be increasing:

yn=(1,  2,  2.5,  2.6,  ).y_{n} = (1,\; 2,\; 2.5,\; 2.6,\; \dots).

This intuition should tempt us to try and apply the Monotone Convergence Theorem (MCT). Thus, we give in, and attempt to firstly prove that it is increasing. Using induction, the base case is easily proved:

y2=2>1=y1.y_2 = 2 > 1 = y_1.

Moving on to the induction step, we assume that yn+1>yny_{n + 1} > y_{n} and obtain

yn+2yn+1=(31yn+1)(31yn)=1yn1yn+1=yn+1ynynyn+1>0.\begin{aligned} y_{n + 2} - y_{n + 1} &= (3 - \frac{1}{y_{n + 1}}) - (3 - \frac{1}{y_{n}}) \\ &= \frac{1}{y_{n}} - \frac{1}{y_{n + 1}} \\ &= \frac{y_{n + 1} - y_{n}}{y_{n} y_{n + 1}} > 0. \end{aligned}

Now, we also prove that the sequence yny_{n} is bounded above. Intuitively, 3 seems like a fairly good candidate. Again, we use induction, to prove that it is a valid upper bound. The base case y1=1<3y_1 = 1 < 3 obviously holds true. For the induction step, assume that yn<3y_{n} < 3. We then have

yn+1=31yn<3    1yn>0    yn>0.\begin{aligned} y_{n + 1} = 3 - \frac{1}{y_{n}} < 3 &\iff \frac{1}{y_{n}} > 0 \\ &\iff y_{n} > 0. \end{aligned}

Focusing on the last inequality we need only prove that yn>0y_{n} > 0. Notice first that we proved that yny_{n} is increasing. Secondly, the lower bound of yny_{n} is 1 (y1=1)(y_1 = 1). Therefore, we have proved that the sequence is bounded above and thus can be certain that the sequence possesses a limit.

0
Submit a solution
Optional • Markdown

Sign in to share your solution for this question.

Sign in

Navigate

Q 2.4.2

Navigate

Q 2.4.2