Skip to main content

Question 2.3.2

Solutions

TZ
leumasicOfficial

7 months ago

(a) By definition,

ϵ>0,NN,nN,nN    xn2<3ϵ2    23xn2<ϵ    2xn43=2xn131<ϵ\begin{aligned} \forall \epsilon > 0, \exists N \in \mathbb{N}, \forall n \in \mathbb{N}, \quad n \geq N &\implies \abs{x_{n} - 2} < \frac{3\epsilon}{2} \\ &\implies \frac{2}{3}\abs{x_{n} - 2} < \epsilon \\ &\implies \abs{\frac{2x_{n} - 4}{3}} = \abs{\frac{2x_{n} - 1}{3} - 1} < \epsilon \end{aligned}

(b) We can solve this using the same approach that was used to proove one of the algebraic limit theorems. That is, notice first that

1xn12=2xn2xn=xn212xn.\abs{\frac{1}{x_{n}} - \frac{1}{2}} = \abs{\frac{2 - x_{n}}{2x_{n}}} = \abs{x_{n} - 2} \frac{1}{\abs{2x_{n}}}.

In our attempt to prove that 1xn12\frac{1}{x_{n}} \rightarrow \frac{1}{2}, we will need to find strict upper bounds on both terms of the product.

By definition, for any ϵ1>0\epsilon_1 > 0, there exists N1N_1 for which the numerator xn2\abs{x_{n} - 2} is strictly bound by ϵ1\epsilon_1 for all nNn \geq N.

For the denominator, since xnx_{n} converges to 2, we can choose ϵ2=32\epsilon_2 = \frac{3}{2}, in which case there exists N2N_2 where xnV32(2)x_{n} \in V_{\frac{3}{2}}(2) for all nN2n \geq N_2. This would then imply an upper bound of 11 for 12xn\frac{1}{\abs{2x_{n}}}.

For any ϵ>0\epsilon > 0, by choosing N=max{N1,N2}N = \max \{N_1, N_2\}, we ensure that the definition of convergence to 2 is satisfied for this sequence.

0
Submit a solution
Optional • Markdown

Sign in to share your solution for this question.

Sign in

Navigate

Q 2.3.2

Navigate

Q 2.3.2