Skip to main content

Question 8.12

Solutions

TZ
leumasicOfficial

3 months ago

a) For contradiction, suppose that supA>y\sup A>y for some yBy\in B. This means that there exists xAx\in A such that

y<x<supA,y<x<\sup A,

which clearly contradicts the premise that xyx\le y for all xAx\in A and all yBy\in B.

b) Since supAy\sup A\le y for all yBy\in B, supA\sup A is a lower bound of BB. Hence, by definition, supAinfB\sup A\le\inf B.

0
Submit a solution
Optional • Markdown

Sign in to share your solution for this question.

Sign in

Navigate

Q 8.12

Navigate

Q 8.12