Skip to main content

Question 5.31

Solutions

TZ
leumasicOfficial

3 months ago

Suppose that

l=limxaf(x)<limxa+f(x)=m.l=\lim_{x\to a^-}f(x)<\lim_{x\to a^+}f(x)=m.

Let

ε=ml2.\varepsilon=\frac{m-l}{2}.

By definition, there exist δ1,δ2\delta_1,\delta_2 such that, for all xx,

0<ax<δ1f(x)l<ε,0<a-x<\delta_1 \Rightarrow |f(x)-l|<\varepsilon,

and

0<ya<δ2f(y)m<ε.0<y-a<\delta_2 \Rightarrow |f(y)-m|<\varepsilon.

Let δ=min(δ1,δ2)\delta=\min(\delta_1,\delta_2). When

x<a<yax<δya<δ,x<a<y\quad \wedge\quad a-x<\delta\quad \wedge\quad y-a<\delta,

we have

x<a<yxa<δya<δ.x<a<y\quad \wedge\quad |x-a|<\delta\quad \wedge\quad |y-a|<\delta.

Then

f(x)<l+m2<f(y).f(x)<\frac{l+m}{2}<f(y).

Also the converse is not necessarily true. We could have

limxaf(x)=limxa+f(x).\lim_{x\to a^-}f(x)=\lim_{x\to a^+}f(x).
0
Submit a solution
Optional • Markdown

Sign in to share your solution for this question.

Sign in

Navigate

Q 5.31

Navigate

Q 5.31