a)
Suppose for contradiction that
x→0limx1=l.Then, by definition,
∀ε>0, ∃δ>0, 0<∣x∣<δ⇒x1−l<ε.But by the reverse triangle inequality, this means that
x1−∣l∣≤x1−l<ε⇒ε+∣l∣1<∣x∣.This in turn means that the inequality does not hold for all x such that 0<∣x−a∣<δ, only for x such that
0<ε+∣l∣1<∣x∣<δ.Hence, we end up with a contradiction.
b)
We prove this again by contradiction. Suppose that
x→1limx−11=l.Then,
∀ε>0, ∃δ>0,0<∣x−1∣<δ⇒x−11−∣l∣≤x−11−l<ε⇒ε+∣l∣1<∣x−1∣.Here again, a contradiction arises from the fact that not all x such that 0<∣x−1∣<δ guarantee the implied inequality, only x such that
0<ε+∣l∣1<∣x−1∣<δ.