(i)
a<b ∧ c<d⟹b−a>0 ∧ d−c>0⟹(b−a)+(d−c)>0⟹b+d>a+c⟹a+c<b+dClosure under additionBy definition(ii)
a<b⟹b−a∈P⟹−a+b∈P⟹−a+b>0⟹−a>−bBy definition(iii)
a<b⟹b−a∈P⟹(b−a)×c∈P⟹(b−a)c>0⟹bc−ac>0⟹bc>ac⟹ac<bcClosure under multiplication(iv) We first notice that:
c<0⟹c∈−P⟹−c∈PThen,
a<b⟹b−a∈P⟹(b−a)×−c∈P⟹(b−a)(−c)>0⟹−bc+ac>0⟹ac>bcClosure under multiplication(v)
a>1⟹a−1∈P⟹(a−1)×a∈P⟹(a−1)a>0⟹a2−a>0⟹a2>aClosure under multiplication(vi)
0<a<1⟹a∈P ∧ 1−a∈P⟹(1−a)a∈P⟹(1−a)a>0⟹a−a2>0⟹a>a2⟹a2<aClosure under multiplication(vii)
b−a,c∈P ∧ d−c,b∈P⟹(b−a)c∈P ∧ (d−c)b⟹bc−ac∈P ∧ bd−bc∈P⟹bc>ac ∧ bd>bc⟹bd>acBy the transitivity property(viii)
0≤a<b ∧ 0≤a<b⟹a2<b2Using 9,c=a,b=d(ix)
a2<b2⟹b2−a2∈P⟹(b−a)(b+a)∈P⟹[b−a,b+a∈P]∨[−(b−a),−(b+a)∈P]Square completionNotice that the second case would lead to a contradiction with the
initial premise that a,b≥0, so we ignore it. With some
simple algebraic manipulation, we obtain:
b−a>0 ∧ b+a>0⟹b>a ∧ b>−a⟹a<bIgnoring the second inequality