Skip to main content

Question 1.5

Solutions

TZ
leumasicOfficial

7 months ago

(i)

a<b  c<d    ba>0  dc>0    (ba)+(dc)>0Closure under addition    b+d>a+c    a+c<b+dBy definition\begin{aligned} a < b \ \wedge \ c < d & \implies b - a > 0 \ \wedge \ d - c > 0 \\ & \implies (b - a) + (d - c) > 0 && \text{Closure under addition} \\ & \implies b + d > a + c \\ & \implies a + c < b + d && \text{By definition} \end{aligned}

(ii)

a<b    baPBy definition    a+bP    a+b>0    a>b\begin{aligned} a < b & \implies b - a \in P && \text{By definition} \\ & \implies - a + b \in P \\ & \implies - a + b > 0 \\ & \implies - a > - b \end{aligned}

(iii)

a<b    baP    (ba)×cPClosure under multiplication    (ba)c>0    bcac>0    bc>ac    ac<bc\begin{aligned} a < b & \implies b - a \in P \\ & \implies (b - a) \times c \in P && \text{Closure under multiplication} \\ & \implies (b - a) c > 0 \\ & \implies bc - ac > 0 \\ & \implies bc > ac \\ & \implies ac < bc \end{aligned}

(iv) We first notice that:

c<0    cP    cP\begin{aligned} c < 0 & \implies c \in -P \\ & \implies -c \in P \end{aligned}

Then,

a<b    baP    (ba)×cPClosure under multiplication    (ba)(c)>0    bc+ac>0    ac>bc\begin{aligned} a < b & \implies b - a \in P \\ & \implies (b - a) \times -c \in P && \text{Closure under multiplication} \\ & \implies (b - a) (-c) > 0 \\ & \implies -bc + ac > 0 \\ & \implies ac > bc \end{aligned}

(v)

a>1    a1P    (a1)×aPClosure under multiplication    (a1)a>0    a2a>0    a2>a\begin{aligned} a > 1 & \implies a - 1 \in P \\ & \implies (a - 1) \times a \in P && \text{Closure under multiplication} \\ & \implies (a - 1) a > 0 \\ & \implies a^2 - a > 0 \\ & \implies a^2 > a \end{aligned}

(vi)

0<a<1    aP  1aP    (1a)aPClosure under multiplication    (1a)a>0    aa2>0    a>a2    a2<a\begin{aligned} 0 < a < 1 & \implies a \in P \ \wedge \ 1 - a \in P \\ & \implies (1 - a) a \in P && \text{Closure under multiplication} \\ & \implies (1 - a) a > 0 \\ & \implies a - a^2 > 0 \\ & \implies a > a^2 \\ & \implies a^2 < a \end{aligned}

(vii)

ba,cP  dc,bP    (ba)cP  (dc)b    bcacP  bdbcP    bc>ac  bd>bc    bd>acBy the transitivity property\begin{aligned} b - a, c \in P \ \wedge \ d - c, b \in P & \implies (b - a) c \in P \ \wedge \ (d - c) b \\ & \implies bc - ac \in P \ \wedge \ bd - bc \in P \\ & \implies bc > ac \ \wedge \ bd > bc \\ & \implies bd > ac && \text{By the transitivity property} \end{aligned}

(viii)

0a<b  0a<b    a2<b2Using 9,c=a,b=d\begin{aligned} 0 \leq a < b \ \wedge \ 0 \leq a < b & \implies a^2 < b^2 && \text{Using 9}, c = a, b = d \end{aligned}

(ix)

a2<b2    b2a2P    (ba)(b+a)PSquare completion    [  ba,b+aP  ][  (ba),(b+a)P  ]\begin{aligned} a^2 < b^2 & \implies b^2 - a^2 \in P \\ & \implies (b - a) (b + a) \in P && \text{Square completion} \\ & \implies [\; b - a, b + a \in P \;] \vee [\; - (b - a), -(b + a) \in P \;] \end{aligned}

Notice that the second case would lead to a contradiction with the
initial premise that a,b0a, b \geq 0, so we ignore it. With some
simple algebraic manipulation, we obtain:

ba>0  b+a>0    b>a  b>a    a<bIgnoring the second inequality\begin{aligned} b - a > 0 \ \wedge \ b + a > 0 & \implies b > a \ \wedge \ b > -a \\ & \implies a < b && \text{Ignoring the second inequality} \end{aligned}
0
Submit a solution
Optional • Markdown

Sign in to share your solution for this question.

Sign in

Navigate

Q 1.5

Navigate

Q 1.5